Archive for May, 2009

Why does Fai work late? Here is the scientific reason.

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

Scientists have found out that night owls can work longer and be more alert late at night. As simple as that.

Researchers found that in tests those who consider themselves more alert in the morning can concentrate for less time than those who work best at night.

The results, reported in the journal Science, suggest that night owls generally outlast early birds in the length of time they can be awake before becoming mentally fatigued.

References:

Night owls can work longer than early birds, scientists find [Telegraph]

Schmidt C, Collette F, Leclercq Y, Sterpenich V, Vandewalle G, Berthomier P, Berthomier C, Phillips C, Tinguely G, Darsaud A, Gais S, Schabus M, Desseilles M, Dang-Vu TT, Salmon E, Balteau E, Degueldre C, Luxen A, Maquet P, Cajochen C, Peigneux P. Homeostatic sleep pressure and responses to sustained attention in the suprachiasmatic area. Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):516-9. [PubMed][Science]

Journal club on 6/4

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Please suggest your favorite paper asap by making a comment here. Once everyone has made a suggestion, we will vote for it. Let’s decide by Thursday.

Thanks!

Down’s syndrome = no cancer?

Monday, May 25th, 2009

People with Down’s syndrome rarely get most kinds of cancer and U.S. researchers have nailed down one reason why — they have extra copies of a gene that helps keep tumors from feeding themselves.

….

“One such gene is Down’s syndrome candidate region-1 (DSCR1, also known as RCAN1),” Harvard’s Sandra Ryeom and colleagues wrote.

This gene codes for a protein that suppresses vascular endothelial growth factor or VEGF — one of the compounds necessary for angiogenesis.

References:

Down’s syndrome reveals one key to fighting cancer [Reuter]

Baek KH, Zaslavsky A, Lynch RC, Britt C, Okada Y, Siarey RJ, Lensch MW, Park IH, Yoon SS, Minami T, Korenberg JR, Folkman J, Daley GQ, Aird WC, Galdzicki Z, Ryeom S. Down’s syndrome suppression of tumour growth and the role of the calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1. Nature. 2009 May 20. [PubMed][Nature]

The origin of RNA

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

A fundamental but elusive step in the early evolution of life on Earth has been replicated in a laboratory.

Researchers synthesized the basic ingredients of RNA, a molecule from which the simplest self-replicating structures are made. Until now, they couldn’t explain how these ingredients might have formed.

….

No matter how they combined the ingredients — a sugar, a phosphate, and one of four different nitrogenous molecules, or nucleobases — ribonucleotides just wouldn’t form. Sutherland’s team took a different approach “and successfully synthesized RNA” in a laboratory conditions resembled those of the life-originating “warm little pond”.

References:

Life’s First Spark Re-Created in the Laboratory [Wired]

Powner MW, Gerland B, Sutherland JD. Synthesis of activated pyrimidine ribonucleotides in prebiotically plausible conditions. Nature. 2009 May 14;459(7244):239-42. [PubMed][Nature]

Silent mutations are not silent after all

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

We briefly mentioned the idea of silent mutation in the lab meeting the other day when we discussed how DNA mutations can cause diseases. In general, a polymorphism in the wobble (3rd) position of the DNA codon often would not change the amino acid sequence. However, that doesn’t mean everything would be the same or the polymorphism would have no effect on the resulting system. It has long been known that there is codon bias, the preference of using particular codons, among different organisms. This may have implications on the fitness of the animals and evolution.

Josh Plotkin’s group at the University of Pennsylvania has recently done a very interesting study on this topic in Science magazine. They synthesized a synthetic library of 154 green fluorescent protein (GFP) with an average of 114 silent mutations between each pair. They found the expressing of these GFPs in E. Coli, as measured by fluorescence of the GFP, can vary as much as 250 fold! Further analyses revealed that this expression difference did not correlate with the codon bias but more to the secondary structures of the RNA.

As it turned out, RNA with more stable secondary structure was harder to be translated into protein and hence a lower expression level. Also, the stability near 5′ start codon explained most of the expression variation, which indicates the rate limiting step of gene expression was primarily translation initiation. They further predicted and experimentally validated GFP variants with rare codon usage, which presumably were more difficult to produce, would be highly expressed if attached with a 5′ sequence with weaker RNA secondary structure. Therefore silent mutations are not that silent after all, it depends on whether you have the right ear to hear.

Reference

Kudla G, Murray AW, Tollervey D, Plotkin JB. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):255-8.Click here to read [PubMed][Science]

Outings

Friday, May 15th, 2009

I am proposing an outing later in the summer, and we may ask the 2nd floor people to join in. In fact I have talked to some people about this idea. We can also come to my place for movies from time to time.

Feel free to write your suggestions here.

What kind of toy should we get?

Friday, May 15th, 2009

I have been thinking that air hockey or table tennis would be fun. I would love to have a Wii around, but we don’t have a convenient projector system in the common room… I believe Liyun’s office would be a great location to put in the new installment.

Our blog’s name

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Please reply to this post and suggest the name that you think would be appropriate for the blog.

I thought of … WonderBlog… but it has been used as the names for several blogs already…

ACLU Challenges Gene Patents

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Gene Patents Stifle Patient Access To Medical Care And Critical Research

NEW YORK – The American Civil Liberties Union and the Public Patent Foundation, a not-for-profit organization affiliated with Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law (PUBPAT), filed a lawsuit today charging that patents on two human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer stifle research that could lead to cures and limit women’s options regarding their medical care. Mutations along the genes, known as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are responsible for most cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. The lawsuit argues that the patents on these genes are unconstitutional and invalid.

Obviously genes should not be patented and should be deposited into the public domain.

Animal can dance to music!

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

A scientific research paper can start with a viral video on youtube. A while ago a cockatoo called Snowball was shown to dance to music.

Interesting questions were raised by this observation. Did the bird really dance to the music or did it mimic the human action? Dancing is a complex behaviour that requires coordination of auditory and motor responses. It has been predicted that the neural circuity evolved in vocal learning species. Motivated by this video, a group of scientists decide to test this out by observing how Snowball dances, and here is the quick result.

The short answer is Snowball can really dance to the music! The whole study was published in Current Biology.

Now the question is, why do animals and humans can both enjoy music? In other words, what is unique about music that can stimulate the nervous systems of different species the same way? What is the common neuro-architecture that underlies this behavior?

Reference

Patel AD, Iversen JR, Bregman MR, Schulz I. Experimental Evidence for Synchronization to a Musical Beat in a Nonhuman Animal. Curr Biol. 2009 Apr 29. [PubMed][Current Biology]